🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a rising number of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and networks are "taking away our kids' youth". A law is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to approve a proposal raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged guardians to prevent their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a good first step," commented a leading MEP behind the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. A prominent charity set up by the family of a young person who died after encountering dangerous platform posts contends that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are safe and fit for minors," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is primarily happening at the local level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced laws mandating parental consent for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from various politicians to follow Australia's example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of the West, further states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies adopt a more measured position. Unicef has advised that social media bans have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve safety.

As this international discussion continues, the actions of Australia and others indicate that governments around the world are no longer willing to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.