🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an event that started out as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since those days, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is commemorated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to declare that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the United States, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to scrub African American heritage and narrative from the archives is under way. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized festivities of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month altogether, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an foundation that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade political issues, and provides room for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the threats that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. Perhaps an complete renaming is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.